Introduction
This might lead us to ask the following questions:
- Are players opting for more control over the rhythm of the game?
- Do players not want to run? We did note, however, that almost every team opted for wholesale changes – four players in and four out – every three or four minutes.
- Do coaches not want their players sprinting forward in transitions? Are they asking for constant calm and control?
- Have teams improved a lot defensively?
- Are goalkeepers getting better and better?
- Is more work being done in training on build-ups than counters?
Of course, there may not be a simple answer to these questions and various factors may be at play. The teams that scored most goals among the eight quarter-finalists were Iran with seven, Argentina and Brazil with six and five for eventual champions Portugal. Those who scored the fewest were RFU with just one and Spain, Kazakhstan and Morocco with two each. What can we deduce from these facts?
- Some teams cover more ground than others
- Some teams have players who are well suited to it while others do not
There were few examples of teams countering the counter – i.e. passages of play featuring three or more counters. The counter-attack has both technical and tactical components. Here are some examples:
Technical aspects
Offensive aspects
As an observation, the teams preferred to launch counter-attacks when they had a numerical advantage, mostly choosing (as was evident) to pause the action where there was a numerical balance (2v2 or 3v3) and starting a controlled build-up instead.
When considering the distances from which the counters are launched, the following can be observed: